Part 6 of 6: N-n the poor victim

N-n has recently published personal, identifying and false material about me on the Internet, despite the fact that I have won an intervention order against her in the Melbourne Magistrates Court in September 2012 which prohibits her from writing about me on the Internet.  I cannot understand N-n’s cruelty.  Even if she cannot get along with her sisters, she should, as I see things, have basic respect for their peace and well-being.

I know N-n’s persona online is that of the long-suffering angel of justice and mercy, but the truth as I see it is that she is a cold, callous, friendless bitch who uses and disrespects people.  That’s not the truth as N-n’s readers see it but it’s my truth, and, with respect, I think I know N-n better than any of her readers.  People who know me in ‘real life’ know that I don’t use words like “bitch” easily; it’s sad that I’m applying that word against my own sister.  However I believe the word to be apt as for years now she has been ignoring my plea to leave me out of her blogs and just discuss her personal issues with her family in a private therapeutic setting such as a support group or with a psychiatrist.  It’s  N-n’s choice to publicise her garbage about her family but it’s also my choice to respond to that online.  I actually feel deeply that I have no real choice but to do that, as I am not a blogger as such.  N-n continually misrepresents me, my other sisters and people outside the family on the WWW.  I regret very much that N-n and I are related.  She was, in fact, a gorgeous lovable little girl but I hate what she has evolved into.  I’m aware that her mental illness impacts on her behaviour but this fact does not lessen the trauma and hurt that she causes her family.  I actually believe that she’s had more love and care from her family over the decades than what she deserves.

As our uncle Z-x in Western Australia wrote to me years ago,

N-n is always the poor victim.

N-n writes that she is “estranged” from him – no wonder!  She stole something out of his house that belonged to him and that he had told her very unambiguously that she could not have.  She hasn’t told the full story online.

One thing I’ve been mulling over for a long time is that I N-n’s adoring readership seems to be unaware that there is a 17-year-old schoolboy out there who is reading online comments from strangers around the world that his father, with whom he has an ongoing relationship, is an “arsehole”, “bastard” etc. and “should be shot in the dick” and so forth.  This is part of the reason why I believe that N-n’s family rants should be private.  N-n may or may not be justified in having grievances against my nephew Dn-x’s other parent – that’s not the issue.  What I’m saying is that I don’t see how it can benefit the juvenile involved here, Dn-x, to read all this vilification of his Dad.  I remember very vividly the intense emotional pain I experienced with my own father constantly rubbishing my mother and beloved grandmother.  Dn-x’s Dad, whatever his failings, has ongoing contact with his son.  In recent years, I have begun to have doubts about the veracity of all the claims that N-n has made about her son’s Dad – they may or may not be true.  However readers should just be aware that there is a 17-year-old schoolboy out there who feels enough emotion towards his father to be in regular contact with him – and respect that relationship.

I also know that Dn-x is troubled by his mother’s flagrant and public sexuality.  N-n has written in her blogs that her son is “fine” with it but he’s not; N-n just minimalises the impact on her son to suit her own purpose.  N-n recently published a blog detailing in explicit terms her lesbian encounter with a young woman she picked up in a nightclub, a blog which she has since deleted (at her son’s pleading?)

N-n does not know the reason why I changed my surname.  She should not have published details of where I live.  She should not be making up malicious stories about our sister W-x who has been a true and loyal friend to N-n over the decades and has put up with a lot more from N-n than I myself could handle.  I could point out here in dot form all the fabrications and distortions about W-x but W-x has asked me not to, to just let N-n rant and rave.  I wish I could have W-x’s serenity about this but it so happens that I’m different and I cannot.

Incidentally, in a ‘copy and paste’ exercise some time ago, I accidentally lost all the comments I had from readers, painful and pleasant, and would dearly love them back again.  If anyone can re-supply their comments and my responses to them, please send to:    paige.foare@y7mail.com                       It was weird how I lost the comments but it is done.  Thank you.

This blog post will not be removed until N-n removes the most recent personal material that she has published about me online.  My message to N-n is this:  Grow up and get a life.

Part 5 of 6: Zoran

I am aghast to note that N-n has recently published a personal document with my real name in it, as well as the names of her two other sisters and the misspelled names of two of our maternal relatives.  N-n and I have been to court over the issue of her continual breaches of my privacy and I have a current intervention order against her which prohibits her from publishing material about me or identifiying me on the Internet.  N-n’s surname is known to many of her bloggers.  That’s fine – but I do not wish to be a part of N-n’s blogs which I have, in the past, told her repeatedly.  It’s very sad that N-n is unable to respect my sensitivities.  N-n and other bloggers hold the erroneous belief that publishing personal material about me online against my will, assists N-n’s cause by proving to the world that she will not succumb to the ‘bully’.  Disrespecting my sensitivities, however, does not assist N-n’s cause at all; it just makes me angrier and serves only to exacerbate the distressing situation that exists between N-n and myself.  A little kindness and caring and respect is the only thing that will resolve our issue.  As I’ve said repeatedly, I have no problem with N-n telling her story to the world (well, I find it distasteful but am prepared to stand back in the shadows about it as I acknowledge that it is her right).  N-n can easily blog about her life, which is obviously an activity that she enjoys and is personally rewarded and fulfilled by, without involving me in a significant degree.  OK, I was her eldest sister so it is unreasonable to expect her to avoid mentioning me altogether and I get that…but she could refer to me in a benign rather than an inflammatory manner, if she cared enough.  It would be the decent thing to do.

Some of N-n’s subscribers seem like nice people but others are obviously quite weird and I would never want them to know anything about me, let alone my name.  As a relative who does not wish to be identified said to me a few months ago, “N-n just doesn’t get it“.

Interestingly, N-n tried to get WordPress to wipe my site altogether.  What do her supporters think now of her assertions about ‘freedom of speech’?  In a WordPress forum that can be viewed online in which N-n hysterically vilifies me, she did at least mention my web site address, so I draw some comfort from knowing that whoever reads N-n’s version of me, is also able to access my side of the story.

In N-n’s blog of 23/2/2013, she recounts the tale of “Zorran” who is actually “Zoran”.  Zoran is gone with the wind decades ago so I feel that it is perfectly acceptable to use his real first name.  N-n writes:

We were locked in gaze, I don’t know for how long, when Zorran made a move.  I could not have escaped if I wanted to, for I was held entirely by the energy of the moment, was hooked on the life of it.

As Zorran approached me, I watched in awe the advance of man.

My eyes never left him as he tread the bridge of our energy, across the room.

Zorran then knelt before me, placed a hand on each of my knees, and slowly opened them.  I resisted at first, I guess by reflex, but then surrendered as he opened them wide, so very wide.  My legs open to receive Zorran into their fold, he crept forward, and soon he was before me, eyes directly before me, energy and body 100% before me.

I was wholly, wholly taken.

The above incident occurred when N-n was still at school.  What she fails to disclose in this personal encounter is that Zoran was actually the steady boyfriend of her best schoolfriend, KP, and that she and Zoran fondled and embraced each other in KP’s bedroom, while KP was absent from the room for a few minutes.  I find it odd to start off with, that N-n would want to share such a personal experience with the world at large on the Internet, but that after a few decades she still has no sense of regret or the inappropriateness of her actions, is an enigma to me.  There are not many people that would share intimacy with the steady boyfriend of their best friend, but N-n did it.  This is an example of what I mean when I describe N-n as a ‘sociopath’; it’s as if there are pieces missing out of her psyche.  What N-n wants, N-n takes.  Zoran is gone with the wind decades ago, but KP is still in N-n’s life.  I’m not sure that KP knows to this day about the treachery.  Don’t worry, N-n, I have no interest in informing her.

It’s a wonder N-n did not ask herself questions about what sort of young man would fondle and embrace another girl in his steady girlfriend’s bedroom while the steady girlfriend was absent for a few minutes.

Again, I appeal to N-n to please respect my privacy online, even if it means that she has to censor a miniscule portion of her ‘tell all’.  To the reader, I say, if YOUR sibling begged you to leave him or her out of your blogs, wouldn’t you do it?  Personally I believe that the vast majority of people would.

It is not normal for N-n to be so hung up on our mother’s death after more than four decades.

I am very willing to wipe this site if N-n will just blacken out my name in the abovementioned personal document.

Part 4 of 6: What a whopper!

Even though I am very busy right now and may not be able to edit Part 3 properly until after the New Year, I’m motivated to find time to respond to some of N-n’s multitudinous whoppers, since she continues to gossip about me online, in some cases in an identifying way, knowing that I strenously object to her doing this.  Some whoppers which need immediate correction include:

  • Her misrepresentation of the words I “seethed” to her on the day that I obtained my intervention order against her for her to stop discussing me online.  I did say something to N-n, but not what she claims I said.  Is N-n deliberately lying or is she genuinely deluded?  Family opinion is conflicted on this point.  Certainly it is very disturbing that N-n can give a false report of words that were spoken to her as recently as 21/9/2012.  What a whopper!
  • Her claim that I am responsible for one sister’s recent admission to hospital.  This particular part of her blog has undergone heaps of edits over the weeks, as N-n has modified her assertions about me.  Despite the lengthy passage of time and numerous edits, she still hasn’t got it right, though!  The ironic thing about this matter is that N-n does not even like this sister, as she does not like any of her sisters.  About seven years ago, I remember asking N-n, after a particularly vitriolic outburst on her part about this sister, “Do you have any emotion or sympathy for D-x at all?”  In the blog, N-n falsely presents herself as the caring sister to D-x, but she is not at all.  The truth is that N-n is consistently horrid to D-x.  She doesn’t even like speaking with D-x, and commonly gets her son to tell D-x on the telephone when she rings her at home, that N-n is in bed asleep or is out, so that she can avoid D-x.
  • In one of her blogs, N-n states that her son Dn-x “urged” her to leave Perth to move to Melbourne.  What a whopper!  Dn-x was, in fact, most upset about this great upheaval in the middle of his last year at primary school, an upheaval which was a major contributing factor to his now being a year behind in his academic career.  N-n should not have moved to Melbourne in the middle of the year; she could have, if she were less selfish and self-absorbed, waited five months until her son had finished his primary education.  N-n will probably get her son to write a letter which she’ll publish online to refute my claim that he opposed the move to Melbourne – doesn’t matter.  I know what I know.  Dn-x was overheard, while N-n was in conversation with another person on the telephone, pleading with his mother to stay in Perth, “Don’t go to Melbourne, MumDon’t goStay here!”  It is a long-established habit of N-n’s to claim that others approve her actions and words when they do not, if a report of their approval boosts her image in the minds of her listeners.  N-n does appear to be living in a fantasy world.  Sure, Dn-x appears to have adjusted somewhat to his new life in Melbourne as most people eventually adapt, but the move was made against his expressed will.  What a whopper!

Part 3 of 6: This blog is currently under construction

Having obtained a two-year intervention order against my mentally ill sister N-n in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Friday 21st September 2012, I was fully prepared to wipe this site altogether and forever. However, N-n is breaching the order by continuing to gossip about me maliciously online and so long as she continues to do that, this site needs to exist as a means of self-defence.  Under normal circumstances, I am not a blogger by real choice or interest.  Were it not for the fact that N-n is blogging about me online and I feel that I cannot ignore it, I would not have a blog site, full stop.

I have a two-year intervention order against N-n that was awarded to me by the Magistrates’ Court of Melbourne. I wanted it to be made permanent but two years was the maximum they would grant me. In part, the order declares that N-n

will not publish on the Internet, by email or other electronic communication any material about the protected persons)…

which is myself.

N-n has done something terrible by dragging her son Dn-x into our quarrel.  I know that N-n’s subscribers have congratulated the son for ‘standing up to the bully’, but my opinion is that N-n should have left her juvenile son right out of it, which is what any responsible and caring mother would have done.

I remember with mostly satisfaction and gratitude my own relationship with my aunts and uncles in my earlier decades. My parents were no good but most of their siblings contributed something positive and enriching to my life. I was lucky to have had them. Dn-x has missed out on the input that extended family can make into a growing person’s emotional and social development, and that is regrettable. My own parents’ siblings cushioned the trauma of my harrowing early years and their memory lies within me forever. I miss my mother’s only sibling, Lilka (Lily). I liked all of my father’s many siblings except for his sister Betty. Rosalie and Mona were my favourites. I miss them. I feel sorry for Dn-x because his mother has ruined the potential that he had to experience a lovely rewarding relationship with his maternal aunts. Dn-x’s disdainful attitude towards his materal aunts is a reflection of his mother’s.  He has also developed a deep overall misogyny – not sure where that comes from – and refers to girls as “skanks” which is disturbing.

N-n says about her son, “Dn-x deserves to have his privacy respected“. What about me? Why am I unworthy? Personally I think she should respect my privacy whether she likes me or not and regardless of her view about the merit of my claim to consideration from her. Then there would never have been any trouble between us.

For about two months, including about two weeks after I obtained an intervention order against her on 21/9/2012 prohibiting her from posting material about me on the Internet, N-n had even posted my photographs online and revealed my real first name, enough to identify me fully to strangers and expose me to all the risks inherent in that exposure! N-n has done all this in the full knowledge (from my expressed objections to her via email and comments to her site) that I strenuously protest her conduct, harbour grave concerns about the potential consequences to myself, and am very disturbed by her reckless disregard for my privacy. I am not a blogger by nature or real enthusiasm and, but for the fact that N-n is blogging maliciously about me in public, I would not have the slightest iota of interest in erecting a blog site of my own or revealing personal matters from my life to the masses around the globe. In fact, I find the whole idea of blogging somewhat distasteful. Some people enjoy it and that’s fine, but it’s not my thing. What’s happening here is that I feel that I am being drawn into something that is totally against my will and natural inclination ie. the unwanted, undesired, uncomfortable predicament of being forced to defend myself against N-n’s lies and distortions about me. My difficulty is extremely unusual insofar as there are not many people in my position ie. who have a mentally ill family member who is blogging about them on the World Wide Web against their will. That means that not many people really understand what I am going through. I can’t actually say that no-one cares but it is true that no-one really understands my ordeal. Well-intentioned people have said things to me like, “It’s just a blog, just words, why do you worry?” or “Just learn to live with it and move on“.

I do accept that blogging is a form of therapy for N-n and it’s something that she finds genuinely rewarding and enjoyable, otherwise I’m sure that she wouldn’t do it. Unlike what N-n has constantly been claiming online, I am not trying to get her to take down her blog site! Nor do I object to her having a different subjective view of our early lives than my own. I truly get that every person’s own perception of their life experience is unique and that even when people grow up in the same family, that does not mean that their individual interpretations of their early life experience necessarily correlate. I truly get that! I am not trying to rewrite N-n’s life story for her; however I object to her discussing me in a personal or identifying way in her published works, including video. It’s important for people to act responsibly in any public forum, in striving to preserve the privacy of those who are still living (not so important when people are deceased.

I’ve complained to WordPress about N-n publishing personal information about me on the Internet and their advice to me is to create my own response web site, which is exactly what I’ve done. I’ve also asked N-n for a copy of her subscriber list in order to exercise a right of reply but she refused. Therefore setting up my own web site is an absolute necessity, notwithstanding the fact that I have no real enthusiasm for blogging. The Internet does have some positives for me – I use it for current affairs, factual information about specific topics, the toughest Sudokus (all the ones in the newspapers are too easy), travel information and email. However when it comes to blogging ie. spending huge amounts spilling one’s guts to the world – no, it doesn’t appeal. At the end of the day, I would rather sit down and read Guy de Maupassant, James Joyce, Jane Austen or Yeats, than stare at a brightly lit computer screen for long periods of time, ploughing through, for the most part, highly introspective, narcissistic and banal productions that are of no real value to me. One thing I have learned through the construction of this web site is that blogging is very very time-consuming! And, I simply would rather be doing other things.

[I do regularly break one time-honoured rule of grammar and that is, beginning a sentence with a conjuncton. I just find that it's frequently a part of natural speech - a part of my speech, anyway!]

Comments are welcome, but mindless moronic emissions of vitriol will be deleted.

People are often very judgmental and quick to make assumptions in the blogosphere, I’ve noticed. For example, my sister ‘Wxx’ was criticised by commenters on N-n’s blog site for writing to N-n that ‘Dn-x’’s father should not be in his life. There was more to the story than what N-n presented – not that the gaps in the story should have been filled on the WWW, but there were reasons why the whole family, not just ‘Wxx’, was concerned with ‘Dn-x’’s father having unsupervised contact with his son. Under normal circumstances, ‘Wxx’ is the last person in the world to seek to deny a child contact with a natural parent.

‘Wxx’ emailed me recently with an interesting perspective on N-n’s blogs. She writes: [names changed to protect privacy]

“Yes I know about N-n’s blog. You ask why I allow her to write such things about me – I can’t exactly disallow her from writing whatever she likes. Yes, it is sometimes hard for me. Yes, I felt sick to see selected excerpts of my personal letters to her up on the Internet. Yes, there are fibs and false memories in her blog and comments. Yes, I do feel I’m being misrepresented somewhat in N-n’s blog. Yes, it didn’t feel good to see people I don’t know and who don’t know me making negative assumptions about me. However, at the end of the day, I don’t know them and they don’t know me. I know that there are probably wider family members reading it too with whom I might want some sort of relationship in the future. Again, if they judge me without actually knowing me, or what I would have to say about what they read about me, I won’t be too interested in relating with them. There is just so much that they don’t know. I would rather that they weren’t getting an ill impression of me from the blog (if they are), but that’s just something I have to deal with. It’s a good exercise for me in letting go.

I would rather relate with people who are kind and wise. If some of N-n’s ‘subbers’ are not kind enough or wise enough to ask ‘Is that so?’, why should I care? I can’t be bothered with trying to change their perceptions, I just can’t be bothered. It would be fruitless, and…they’re nothing to me. It’s the people actually in my life that I’m more concerned about. I’ll relate with them the best I can as the occasion arises…

[N-n]…is pretty sick. 3 times now in the last 2 years I’ve been with N-n in Intensive Care as she has come to after an overdose. Holding a straw to her lips so she could have a few sips of orange juice. Bringing her everything she needed materially. Doing her laundry. Spending days and days at hospital. Trying to chase up her lost necklace (twice!) Bringing ‘Dn-x’ to see her. Driving her home. Driving her and ‘Dn-x’ around for a few days afterwards ‘cos she felt she couldn’t drive. Staying at their flat to look after ‘Dn-x’ if he wasn’t elsewhere, or to be with N-n when she came out. Cancelling a lot of work (I don’t get leave). Dealing with the hospital staff and social workers and ‘Dn-x’ ‘s friends’ parents, etc… If this blog gives her a reason to live and she feels like she’s making real connections with people through it, I’m glad for her. I try to take each day as it comes, ‘Lxx’.

I am sorry that you are so distressed by N-n’s blog. Don’t read the bloody thing! That’s what ‘Cxx’ tells me…..

I wish you well ‘Lxx’,

‘Wxx’ “

Modern cyber technology has not yet caught up with privacy issues and it could be decades before they do. I do think in the future after a lot of cases like mine inevitably come to light, that privacy laws will probably be updated to protect individuals from potentially libellous blogs such as N-n’s.

Where N-n describes me as her “eldest sister” online, I feel that this identifies me to a lot of people both within and without the family and it scares me, as N-n is not exercising much discretion or prudence in her published works. It would be better to say instead, “a relative” or “a family member” [told me, came to us etc.], especially as I dispute much of what N-n writes, not just about me but about others. This would be what is called “ethical publishing“. In a lot of cases, N-n uses people’s real first names (as she did with mine in the beginning).

According to N-n, her son has been complicit in urging N-n to post material about me on the Internet which he knew would hurt and embarrass me, which is disturbing. N-n ought not to have taken counsel for her actions in posting false and identifying material about me (much of which she has since taken down) from a sixteen-year-old boy, nor should she have ever drawn him into our quarrel. People commenting on N-n’s blogs have congratulated the son for ‘standing up to the bully’ – how twisted can you be!

As a small child and young girl, N-n was absolutely adorable and easy to love, and was indeed loved, cherished and valued by all her three older sisters. There was real love and caring in those days – or that was my understanding of the situation. However, throughout her adult life in particular, N-n has never really seemed to even be aware of her sisters or their feelings or their pain; only being conscious of her own feelings and experiences. N-n has consistently treated her sisters with undeserved disdain and indifference. At this advancing stage of my life, I deem it best for both parties, in the interests of harmony and mental equilibrium, that N-n and I separate from each other but N-n makes this impossible for me by including me in a significant way in her blogs. Therefore I am forced to constantly defend myself. As adults, N-n and I should be living peaceably out of each other’s lives, but wishing each other well for old times’ sake. However this Internet nightmare makes that impossible.

N-n feels she has the right to express herself at will without consideration for the collateral damage caused to others. I’ve sent N-n several PRIVATE emails and notes to her home address from December 2011 (not published on the Internet) pleading with her to leave me out of her blogs, all to no avail. There are not many people who, when their sibling pleads with them to make small modifications to their online blogs in the interests of privacy, would ignore that sibling – but N-n has completely disregarded me. In fact, she actually described my concerns as “nonsense”.

A further illustration of N-n’s distortion of events: In one of her blogs, she recounts a single incident of shoplifting. N-n told me years ago that she “had to” steal from shops because her husband wasn’t giving her enough money for housekeeping. In other words, it wasn’t an isolated incident as N-n presents. N-n simply has a sense of entitlement, as all shoplifters do. In the incident that N-n recounts in one of her earlier blogs, she says she stole “groceries” because the butcher required her to purchase a minimum of four sausages instead of the two that she wanted for her and her husband’s tea – therefore she felt “cheated” by the butcher. The butcher, of course, was entitled to require her to make a minimum purchase, which is a common business practice. It is not economically viable to provide packaging for very small purchases in some businesses. Even the big supermarket chains have a 100g minimum purchase on most delicatessen items. N-n had the option of either purchasing four sausages or none, and she chose to make the minimum purchase (she could have put two sausages aside for the next night’s tea!) N-n stole “groceries”, not meat, so I can only assume that she sought recompense for the ‘crime’ committed against her from a retailer other than the original ‘perpetrator’ of the ‘crime’ against her ie. the butcher.

When I returned home yesterday evening, there was a card lodged in my front door that asked me to call a certain police officer on a particular number. I didn’t know until just this moment on reading N-n’s latest blog that she has obtained an interim intervention order against me to prevent me responding to her comments about me on her blogs. I have not been served with this intervention order but I guess I can consider myself served now that I have read N-n’s latest blog. N-n published her interim intervention order against me on the World Wide Web before it had even been served on me.

I have sent the police officer an email with my telephone number as he or she asked me for my number on the card.

[Postscript 3/9/2012: I was served with the interim order last night Saturday 2/9/2012. I did advise the officer that I could not abide by Section 2 of the order so yes, Edward Hotspur, I'm getting a "shiny new place to live" soon. Are you happy now?]

To South Australia Police: I don’t mean to disrespect the law, but unfortunately I cannot remove this blog until N-n decides that she will respect my privacy in her blogs. I know that this means that you will arrest me and I’m scared about that but it must be done. Please try to understand and try not to be too angry with me for defying the law. I am ready for you to arrest me as you are obliged to do by law. I know that I will have a criminal record after you arrest me and I am sorry about that but my feelings about fighting for my privacy on the Internet and in all of my sister’s published works including video and the printed word are stronger. But of course I must accept the consequences for breaking the law as I am not above the law.

To N-n: I hope you will not close down your blog but I beg you to please respect my privacy in your published works ie. whether on video, Internet blogs or the printed word (hard copies of your works). Please avoid mentioning me in your published works except in the most benign manner. Please do not refer to me as “eldest sister” because this identifies me to people who know us and I’m embarrassed. Please remove my real name where is appears in the Comments section of one of your blogs. I know you do not understand my feelings but I am not lying when I tell you that your caustic unflattering words have hurt, humiliated and embarrassed me. Please remove the photographs of me as an adult that you have published on the Internet. I have asked you previously never to publish a photograph of me over the age of about ten. Please consider my feelings even if you do not understand them. You are hurting me, N-n. I know you do not understand that but I am not lying.

I said some really nasty things to you. However, the only words that I truly apologize for are where I urged you to “hang yourself” and similar nefarious sentiments in that vein. No person has a right to say that to another human being and I am ashamed of those words. I am deeply sorry. If you had done that, I would have felt guilty to the end of my days, and deeply painfully remorseful and sad. Would I have felt, though, a sense of personal loss and grief? I’m afraid not, N-n. That is horrendous, I know, but it is the truth. Also the truth is that I hope you never commit suicide. I hope you do not discontinue your blogs as you need them, they are your therapy and I truly get that, but I plead with you to respect my privacy and remove all personal or identifying reference to me.

I did not know that August 21st was going to be an interim intervention order application hearing. If I had known, then I would have been there to contest it. Why wasn’t I told? I am upset that I was not informed as I would have shot over to Melbourne without a doubt. I’ve been in regular email contact with Melbourne Magistrates’ Court about my intention to contest N-n’s order and file a cross-application of my own, but was never told about this interim intervention order application.

[Postscript 4/9/2012: I've just opened an email from a spokesperson at Melbourne Magistrates' Court which reads: "The court would only have had notice on the day not beforehand that N-n was going to apply for an interim order". This spokesperson has also kindly booked me in for an appointment to lodge my cross-application against N-n at 9.00 a.m. on Monday 17th September. If I'm in prison by that date, I guess the authorities will take care of my interstate transportation needs for court purposes, so perhaps I should delay purchasing my Firefly ticket until the last minute].

I’m being booted off this public library computer very soon so I will do a copy and paste of this blog right now and email it to South Australia Police.

Please, N-n, retain your blogs but keep them about YOUR life (not my life). You find blogging rewarding even though it’s not my cup of tea. However, I believe now (not previously) that your blogs benefit you and are a genuine interest and font of meaning for you. You need the support and friendships that you have formed. But, again, I implore you to please protect my privacy as privacy is very important to me.

To Red, I know that I have made you angry by threatening to commit suicide if you did not remove the humiliating comments on your blog. My words were sincere but as is evident, I did not commit suicide. I guess I’m too gutless but I really did believe that I would. I certainly felt very low and depressed as I still am. I’m on medication to cope with N-n’s blogs. (How’s that for a breach of my own privacy?) I must be stronger than I thought I was. I hope I continue to be stronger than I think I am. I hope I do not commit suicide as deep down, I believe that it is a mistake and an act against nature. I’ve always had a bit of contempt for people who resort to suicide, as well as pity and a sense of regret, and I guess, Red, you must be full of contempt and hatred for me as you believe that I hate N-n. I do not. I know you do not believe me and none of N-n’s devotees will, but somehow, I find that it is still very very important that I have a place and a space and an opportunity to respond to N-n’s blogs, via this blog. No matter what people believe, I still need to have a voice of my own. It’s irrelevant whether people choose not to read my blog or ridicule my blog – yes, I’m a sensitive soul and it hurts, but somehow it has to be irrelevant and somehow it’s just critical that I have a voice and that’s why I can’t take this blog down in accordance with the interim intervention order, unless N-n removes all personal reference to me from her Internet blogs, videos and published (hard) works. I understand that but will anyone else be able to understand?

N-n stated in her blog of 12/7/2012 that she would never have left Daniel alone with a man as she didn’t trust men. She called me a liar (among other things) for claiming that her then-boyfriend Steve regularly cared for ‘Dn-x’ when he was small. Interesting, given that this is what N-n says in an email dated 27/12/2000:

Last week, following Christmas, I worked 3 full days and Steve cared for ‘Dn-x’ at $15 each day. I gave him incidental money on top of that. It was all I could do, really, and I was most grateful for the work. No work in sight this week. Steve starts Uni in February, so who knows how any of it will work out.

And in an email dated 13th February 2001, she says:

I feel I haven’t written for ages, though don’t exactly know the date. I have been a little busy – after being sick, Steve, God bless him, let me disappear in a motel for 3 nights while he cared for ‘Dn-x’ over a weekend… Oh, it was bliss…

And what have we here, in an email dated 21st February 2001:

…Full days end at 3, but Steve has organised his Uni timetable to be able to pick him [‘Dn-x’] up certain days if necessary. This was wonderful of him, and I didn’t even ask him to do that…

Part 1 of 6: How to rid yourself of a “cyberstalker” – continue to gossip constantly about that person online!

This web site exercises a right of reply to N-n’s blog on WordPress in which she expressly states that her purpose for writing is solely to narrate the story of her own and her son’s life – but which in fact, especially in more recent months, increasingly discusses me in a highly personal, demeaning and identifying way which I feel violates my privacy and is very distressing for me. I have no objection to N-n blogging about her own life, thoughts, experiences etc. but I do possess a reasonable expectation that she will have proper regard for my privacy.  All ethical authors of published works are mindful of the need to minimise harm and maintain the confidentiality rights of persons, especially those who are not yet deceased.

I have excellent advice for any of you who perchance wish to rid yourselves of a “cyberstalker” either now or at any point in the future – continue to gossip constantly about that person online, especially in a malicious, inflammatory and misleading way! Take it from Aunty L-x, that’s the way to do it! :-)

If I had a cyberstalker, I would not inflame the situation by continuing to gossip about and discredit that person in my online blogs. What about you, what would you do? It’s a wonder N-n’s supporters don’t counsel her to do the obvious, which is stop inciting the “stalker”. Duh! Watch how quickly this “stalker” would be gone with the wind if N-n was mature and insightful enough to practise this self-evident truth!

I was granted an intervention order at the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on 21/9/2012 which states, in part:

…The Court orders that the respondent must not…publish on the Internet, by email or other electronic communication any material about the protected person(s)…

But she’s still at it!

N-n blames me in her blog of 6/10/2012 for our sister D-x’s recent mental relapse and hospitalisation, citing a letter written by me to D-x as the direct cause.  I wrote the letter following a number of communications from D-x including a gift, apology, cards and letters and the urgent plea, “Please write me a letter, L-x“.  N-n claimed originally that I wrote to our sister, “Shut yer trap“. Flagrant lie.  She has since done multiple edits and now claims that I wrote “Shut yer mouth” which is also untrue.  Not only do I not use the word “trap” in that context but I would not write “yer” unless I was quoting someone else.  N-n also claimed (before later editing) that my letter was about 60 pages long.  It was less than a third of that length.  My letter to my sister D-x is a private matter which N-n should not have broadcast on the WWW.

N-n told lies about me to D-x and her companion which, in the letter, I set out to disprove, quoting from N-n’s own emails to me. Is this what N-n is really agitated about?

As my uncle Z-x in WA wrote to me years ago,

N-n is always the poor victim.

Thank you, Aurora, for doing as I asked. I appreciate that very much, and your ability to express your dissent on your site about the ‘nasty’ email I sent you without getting too personal or identifying people. Mystery Coach also has that rare ability but otherwise it is not a common trait in the blogosphere.

N-n has deleted a substantial amount of material, including my name and photograph, from her site but she does need to go further ie. allocate some time to going right through her blog site and videos to edit the words “eldest sister” and where applicable, “Lana” and “eldest sister“.  The phrase ”eldest sister“, in particular, will identify me to some people.  I’m still feeling very exposed and vulnerable as N-n has been reckless and there is still quite a bit of her wreckage out there.

In return for N-n’s substantial deletion of material about me from her site, I’ve also deleted a substantial quantity of material about her from this site and am very willing to wipe this site altogether when I see that all of N-n’s derogatory references to me  have been removed from her own site as well as other people’s.

N-n has her devotees wrapped around her little finger (especially Heretic and Prenin) and I’m certain that they would delete material that she has had printed on their sites at her sincere request.

I especially would like deleted:

1. The nasty distorted comments about me on N-n’s ‘”About” page.  N-n identifies me to some people by referring to me as “eldest sister”, despite knowing full well that I object very strenuously to this.  That kind of indifferent behaviour demonstrates very clearly to me that N-n’s character has evolved to a point where she is as vengeful, petty and twisted as our father.  I know N-n could not see the likeness, but her character is really quite similar to our father’s, and I regard them both in the same light.  In fact, I occasionally think of N-n subconsciously as “Tomleen”.

2. Derogatory comments about me on Heretic’s site. I do not have access to technology which would allow me to view or hear his “podcast” (will have to look up that meaning) and audio tape denouncing me but definitely N-n’s printed slings at me are inappropriate on a world wide medium.  Heretic describes me at that location as “full of shit”. What a drongo. Most people who know me regard me as honest, decent and responsible, an expectation that I also hold towards others.

N-n learns that I am unhappy about the comments made by her on Heretic’s site – so she posts a direct link on her own site to that section of Heretic’s site.  It’s that kind of mentality that ‘estranges’ N-n from most of her family.  N-n uses the word ‘estranged’ a lot to describe my place in the family – but that’s actually a word that applies most aptly to N-n, who is estranged from nearly everyone because of her behaviour and attitudes.

3. On Prenin’s site, N-n spreads a rumour started by our chronically mentally ill sister D-x that I’ve been subjecting her to silent crank calls for five years. This is just nasty rumourmongering.  The allegation is false.  N-n knows that D-x has also made outrageous claims about herself and others and, over the years, has done some very weird and disconnected things that have caused her to be committed to hospital. It is not fair or kind to repeat these deluded convictions of our unfortunate sister.

4.  Garbage about me on N-n’s post of 16/10/2012 ie. blaming me for one sister’s mental relapse, identifying me by giving clues about my town of residence, falsely claiming I wrote “Shut yer mouth“.  N-n genuinely wonders why I call her a liar and a fraud.  “N-n is always the poor victim“…

5.  N-n should get R-x to remove her ugly defamatory post about me or allow me to leave my own comprehensive comments on that same post or N-n should add a further comment to that site saying she apologises for her fabrications that I am on a disability pension and because of mental issues. I read somewhere that R-x is going to publish her people satire in a book – that’s outrageous. She herself is not without blemish although she thinks she is.

I wish I could start a new career as a Defamation and Malice prosecutor; I’d be issueing writs left, right and centre – and most of the bloggers on WordPress would be conscientiously pursued! One thing I’ve learnt about the blogosphere, a very unappealing feature for me, is that people form judgments very very quickly and are so ready to condemn.

6.  Gossip about me in N-n’s comments on her blog of 20/10/2012.  The comments are especially offensive because she repeats ‘nasty’ things I said to her without providing context or background – she even claims she has no idea why I was angry!

7.  In March 2013, N-n published a private document with not just my name in it, but also the names of her other two sisters.  I want my name blackened out in that document, for privacy reasons.

8. I would like a letter from N-n, through a lawyer or professional mediator, advising me of all remaining comments made by herself, or possibly her son, on other people’s sites that I have not listed here.  I know I’ve said in the past that this is a request but not a condition; however I’m now making it a condition, and the reason is that N-n has consistently demonstrated an absoloutely callous disregard for my concerns and has publicly humiliated me and left me vulnerable to unjust and scathing attacks from strangers by not honestly presenting my case.  In short, I do not trust N-n one iota, and therefore require a written reassurance from her through a lawyer or certified mediator, that there are no further privacy breaches against me on the Internet.

All I ever wanted was for N-n to respect my privacy in her published works! And yet, incredibly, many of N-n’s subscribers genuinely believe that I have no right to expect that.  However, I know from the private emails I receive that at least some of N-n’s subscribers are reading my response blog site and have at least a little sympathy for my position.

Given N-n’s mental state, I realise I have Buckley’s and none of having the above reasonable conditions met, and that this list is going to expand exponentially over time – but the above are still my conditions, and I will not wipe this site unless N-n meets them.

I will wipe all of this site if Conditions 1-8 above are met.

Part 2 of 6: Answering Polestar88

To Polestar88:  I’m addressing part of your private email to me here.  With reference to my father, N-n’s portrayal of our father has been accurate:  I do not care what she says about our father.  In the case of my sister W-x, you can read her email to me reproduced in Part 1.  In the case of my sister D-x, this one idolises N-n and would do anything for her including jump over the cliff. She is likely to allow N-n to write anything she likes about her.

The following is a copy of a small portion of a letter that I sent to two Victorian cousins, dated 31/1/2012:

“…I’m not sure how much N-n has told you both about our early lives but it was truly an horrific experience. Who knows what might have been if we had only been born into a different family… N-n has…beatified her mother…[but] actually, both parents were pretty inadequate people. In fact, I cannot think of my early years without wincing.

“…Canterbury Terrace, East Victoria Park was truly a ‘house of horrors’. My sisters and I have survived this ‘house of horrors’ but, as you would expect, not entirely without deep psychological scars. We all suffered but most especially D-x and N-n…

“I do feel pity for my mother as a human being who suffered most terribly but she also was cruel and heartless at times…the only positive comments my father ever made about my mother were: “She was a looker” and “She made men’s heads turn“. Everything else that spewed out of his mouth about her was full of bilious hatred and rage (although, strangely, he always claimed that he loved her deeply).

“Quote from my father: “No man could have loved yer mother the way I loved yer mother“. The tragedy is that he truly believed that!…that no other man could have loved her deeply, and that what looked like and felt like hatred was really love. How weird is that?

“…Usually the family at Canterbury Terrace only bathed once a week. I remember an occasion on which I went to play with children from up the road. Their mother, Mrs. Light, put me under her shower and washed me before she would allow me to play with her children. Notwithstanding the ’60s photographs that exist of the pristine, smiling little girls in spotless starched clothing and with shining hair, we were actually quite dirty most of the time. The house at Canterbury Terrace was absolutely squalid – rotting food, beer cans, overflowing ash-trays, pills, putrid laundry, trash, cockroaches and flies everywhere, blood-spattered and partly smashed walls, peeling paint making a mess on the floors, broken crockery, dust and dirt. My mother was filthy like her mother (my grandmother) was and did not have much knowledge or interest in food hygiene. In particular, I remember stinking raw meat and rancid butter that had been left out of the rickety old refrigerator. We children were always coming down with stomach aches and the associated vomiting and diarrhoea, and crying with the pain of these frequent illnesses for which my mother used to just give us a Bex powder.

” “Bex is better!” (the television commercial at the time).

W-x in particular was always suffering bronchial illnesses and I believe now that it was because of all the second-hand smoke in the house from my chain-smoking parents. I still have white patches on my legs from the infectious boils that plagued me during childhood, which were probably a result of the grimy living conditions that we children called “home”. My mother dealt with the boils matter-of-factly by simply squeezing them. She seemed indifferent to my howling.

“I have to chuckle when I read or hear in the news that parents have been fined for leaving their children for three minutes in the car while they went to the shop to collect something. My parents left us kids alone all the time. All the time! Day or night! There was one incident when I was about eight and had been left to care for my sisters all day. We were hungry with one or two of the sisters crying, so I went to the kitchen and searched the cupboards for food, finding some potatoes. I then proceeded to cut the potatoes into chips with a knife and placed them into a frying pan to cook. I added some liquid or something to the pan which caused a terrifying explosion of fire and smoke to belch out to the ceiling. I ran screaming hysterically to Mrs. Welsh next door and she came and extinguished the fire, but the ceiling area above the stove remained blackened until the day we vacated the house after my mother died. No-one sustained any burns but my sisters and I were very shaken by the incident.

“As I said in my interview with Melbourne’s RMIT for their After the Orphanage project – which culminated in a book being published including some of my remarks under a pseudonym – I did suffer a lot of physical abuse from my mother…

“I do believe that my mother liked D-x and N-n better than W-x and me.

“…The fact is that my mother would have faced criminal charges if the abusive incidents had occurred in today’s era ie. the… My mother told me herself in later childhood of an event when I was about eighteen months old in which I threw her book into the fire and she responded by flying into a rage and…fractures which healed themselves. She did say to me while recounting the incident that she was very sorry about it, so that was something.

“I believe that my mother’s early death did actually save me from a lot of physical abuse… My mother was definitely a victim as N-n says, but she was also a perpetrator. It’s not black and white. My sisters and I did not have one good parent and one bad parent – neither was a parent I would have chosen for myself. Of course I regret the great psychological suffering that besieged this unfortunate woman who was my mother, and drove her to take her own life – I was there, I witnessed the suffering, and if I could have prevented her death, I know that I would have. However that does not detract one iota from the fact that I believe that my mother’s violence towards me would have escalated as I grew older and more “contrary” and independent.

“One thing my mother used to say often to me was, “Don’t contradict“.

W-x told me only a few years ago that she was “relieved” when our mother died and that when our father broke the news of the death to us in the kitchen at Canterbury Terrace, she was crying “only because everyone else was crying”. W-x has no memory whatsoever of a single small act of kindness or love directed towards her by our mother, who in fact consistently ignored and punished her. My recollection of W-x in those days is that she was always crying and always ill with bronchial complaints (as I said earlier, probably from all the secondhand smoke in the house).

“I just don’t think that my mother was a natural mother…and I don’t think N-n is either. I think my mother found motherhood really hard, in particular the lack of abundant free time to herself which she coveted, and the seemingly interminable drudgery of motherhood in those days (eg. the old washing-machine with the wringer that you had to laboriously fold wet clothes into and wait for them to be churned out again on the other side), and of course the specific hostile and cruel conditions in which she lived with her abusive, gambling and alcoholic husband.

“My mother was described by her own mother as “hot-tempered and selfish“. My grandmother also add, “Lila was much better“. My mother did lament to me about her mother that “She loved Lila more“; so my mother had to deal with the pain of being the unfavoured child in the family, which I know hurt her. My grandmother’s preference for her younger daughter is explained by my cousin T-x in these words, “She [Krystyna] was a difficult child“. My grandmother who resembled my sister W-x physically, also was similar to W-x in temperament ie. cool and distant. My mother’s father, who died when my mother was eight, is described by T-x as “a hard father“. For example, normal infantile behaviour such as soiling napkins angered him unduly. My grandfather is reported to have dealt with a yowling cat outside the house interrupting his sleep by exploding with rage and shooting it with a pistol. It seems that my mother must have inherited her father’s mercurial temper; T-x told of an incident in which my mother tried to stab her sister Lila with a pair of scissors when they were young women. So obviously my mother had problems before she met my father and she was capable of violence. I’ll bet you anything, though, that T-x has not spoken a word to N-n of this incident!

“The family in Perth could have been reasonably well-off financially, if not outright rich. My uncle (by marriage), Z-x, who still lives in Perth, said of my father, “He was earning good money, better than me“. My father seems always to have worked full-time but we never had any money – it all went on gambling, booze, massage parlours and anything my father wanted. He seemed indifferent to our needs. Aunty Mona knew my father was mean; she used to say, “Your father begrudged every pencil and notebook that you girls needed for school“.

[Interjection: Another story my Aunty Mona told me decades ago was how my father used to frequent his sister Rosalie's house at East Burwood when her children were small. He'd walk into their lounge on a warm summer's day in his sailor's uniform and cap holding icecreams which he would devour in front of his small nieces and nephews who would stare at their uncle longingly, but he never bought any icecream for the children. Rosalie and her husband were poor in those days and could rarely afford to buy icecream for their kids. My father thought it was funny to taunt the children with the words, "You'd like some, wouldn't you? Well, you're not getting any!"]

“Friends and acquaintances of my mother whom I spoke to in later life have described how my father did not give my mother enough money for housekeeping. We were always so very poor and it was humiliating. Every school excursion or raffle ticket or Brownie fee was an arduous battleground for us kids. It was humiliating to be harassed for money by teachers or Brownie leaders for upcoming events which I couldn’t get my parents to pay for, or to be the only child in the classroom without the coloured textas, glue or books that I needed. It was so horrible. Our food was usually saveloys and mash except when we visited our grandmother’s house. We loved to visit our grandmother’s house.

“Our perpetual poverty was so needless. We could have, and should have been, reasonably comfortable at least.

“All of us four girls were given a plastic coloured piggy bank by our mother and she would occasionally put copper coins in each one so that we could save something. My father was such a bastard, he was always threatening to raid the piggy banks, knowing how precious they were to us. One Sunday morning as my mother and myself and sisters were leaving the house to attend the local church, my father threatened to raid our piggy banks while we were gone, so I hid them. My sisters were distressed about our piggy banks being raided so I told them that I had hidden the precious piggy banks and I remember my mother being very pleased with me for that.

“My mother always maintained a savings account at the bank in her own name and would not agree to a joint account with my father, an issue which rankled with my father for decades after her death… That was one thing that my father never succeeded in controlling about my mother.

“There was always hatred and violence in the house, not necessarily always physical, but psychological violence, always. My father was a hateful raging fiend who used to get the pickaxe and smash holes in walls and wardrobes to frighten us, break off wooden palings from the fence and wave them around at us with threats of violence, destroy glass crockery in front of us…

“When I was about three, there were scenes in which my father used to burn money in the fireplace in front of my mother and me, with my mother crying helplessly as the notes went in one by one, slowly and deliberately into the fire, and me very distressed and trying to comfort my mother. The pain of those scenes was just unbearable.

“There was always yelling, screaming and crying in the house. My father was always snarling at my mother, “Shut yer trap…yer bitch…so get this through yer thick skull…damn you…go to hell“…

“There was one occasion when the whole family was going out for the day, possible to the beach which was a favourite destination for us kids. Before leaving the house, we counted how many bags we were carrying. We counted seven bags and then my father piped up, “No, there are nine!”, indicating my mother and me. About ten years old at the most, and already a “bag”!

“My father distinguishes himself in my memory as being a very mean and nasty person, however jovial, conversational and affable he can appear in public or at parties. Example: If someone eg. Monsignor O’Connor who was our parish priest at East Victoria Park, or Mrs. Aleksiejewski who was a friend of my grandmother’s, gave my father money to buy his children an ice-cream or similar treat, we never got the ice-cream or treat. My father, however, was never short of money for cigarettes, beer or betting on horses.

“I was dragged out of bed in the middle of the night as a primary school child to look for a pen that my father accused me of having lost. I was in my night wear, it was cool, windy and dark and I was wandering barefoot through the dry unkempt grass of the front yard without any lighting (no outside lighting at the house, no torch), looking for the pen, with this large man at my elbow hounding and threatening me. I don’t think I found the pen.

“Then there was the evening in which my parents had been bickering horribly all night. My father summoned his children together (all four of us aged under ten) and demanded that we choose one parent over the other…which parent we loved more, Mum or Dad? It was a most anguished choice that we had to make. I chose my father out of terror when it was really my mother that I loved more. XXXX also chose our father. YYYY and ZZZZ chose our mother and all three disappeared out of the house. It transpired later that my mother and her two followers had hidden under the house while XXXX and I were with our father denouncing our mother. It was a most distressing event for me as I didn’t know where my mother had disappeared to or if she would forgive me for choosing my father over her. Years later when I confronted my father over this incident, he was without empathy or insight into the anguish that he had caused or the unjustifiable cruelty of his action in forcing his small children to choose between their parents. He is characteristically indifferent to the suffering and havoc that he causes other people, particularly his own family, but is hyper-sensitive to any perceived slight or disrespect directed towards himself by others.

“My father is arrogant and narcissistic beyond belief. He gave D-x a black eye when she was about fifteen during an argument about the infallibility of the Pope. My father was insisting that the Pope was infallible and D-x and I were laughing at the idea and ridiculing it. My father couldn’t tolerate our independent opinions and so won the argument with violence…but would he ever hit a man? Never heard of him being involved in a physical confrontation with a man – ever!

“My father has always…showed far greater deference and sensitivity to the feelings of strangers and acquaintances while trampling over his own family. Example: When I was about sixteen, I brought a friend, MJ, to meet the family during a weekend at the Housing Commission home in Hiddleston Avenue. A group of us was congregated in the kitchen. To reach the toilet, you had to walk through the kitchen. MJ wanted to visit the toilet and my father very politely asked if she would prefer everyone to leave the kitchen for the sake of her privacy, an office which MJ declined. It struck me that at the moment, as it does now, how a person can have two faces – a kind and caring face to strangers and the distantly acquainted, and a contorted, cruel, venomous face for kith and kin. My father used to regularly barge into his teenaged daughters’ bedrooms without knocking or giving any warning, which was very disturbing and made us jumpy as we could be undressing or doing something private – yet he could be so solicitous and respectful towards outsiders. When expressing angry feelings towards my father about his barging into our bedrooms without knocking, he would become aggressive, yelling, “A man’s home is his castle!” or “I’ll do what I like in my own house!” and pound his fist down hard on a table…

“My father embodied schadenfreude or “the malicious enjoyment of another’s misfortunes” ie. he always enjoyed other people’s divorces, turmoil or mishap etc. The K-x’s were “godless” but I would have preferred to have been born into that family as at the least the K-x children had the love and commitment of their parents, which is bedrock.

“…My father seemed generally to have a disdain towards the entire female gender. In front of his mates or neighbours, he can exude compassion and concern in a discussion about a documentary screened on television about the treatment of women in Pakistan, condemning the subjugation of women in backward countries or primitive practices such as bride burning or the inequitable division of assets, and everyone applauds him and thinks he’s a terrific New Age guy. Nobody knows or would believe that a brutal merciless bastard he is or was to his own wives and children.

“One of my father’s pet rages was single mothers and
illegitimate children (as if any child is “illegitimate”!) He didn’t want D-x to mention at C_____ College that that H-x K-X was her cousin because he was disgusted by the fact that she had given birth out of wedlock. My mother was pregnant with me when she married my father; that’s why her wedding dress in the photographs was blue, not white (although I didn’t find out the reason until my mid teens).

“Despite my father’s apparent puritanism, he did have both an obsession with and a repugnance towards femininity and female bodies and functions. He was often smutty in the way he spoke to his young daughters eg. telling us, “Don’t stand around like a wet dream“, and he used to sing songs from his former time as a sailor such as “Every girl loves a candle“. He was full of contradictions…[he] was always trying to impose values on his children that he himself did not practise.

“My father was always fixated with sexual crime and would devour the newspapers for prurient details of defiled and ravaged victims…

“There were never any boundaries with my father. He never respected confidences, never had any sense of his children’s entitlement to privacy and seemed to actively enjoy divulging very personal details about his children that caused intense humiliation and embarrassment. I use the word “sadistic” to describe my father, in the full sense of the word…

“In early 1981 when I was aged twenty, my father wrote to me in Perth to ask if he could stay with me during a two-week visit. I was troubled by this request and discussed it with relatives and people who had known the family in WA. In the end, I decided that it would be ‘decent’ if I allowed him to stay but I made the stipulation that he must not smoke in my unit. I’ve never smoked and always hated it. At that time, my father was a chain smoker and ridiculed my non-smoking stance eg. when he was angry with me, his face would contort, spittle would form at the corners of his mouth and he would snarl, “And don’t say you’ll never smoke!”, (implying that I would stray from that resolution at some point in the future).

“There were problems as soon as my father arrived at my unit in East Perth. He subjected me to a lot of pressure about withdrawing my ‘no smoking’ rule, telling me that I was “hard” and that nobody does that to a father who has travelled a long way to visit his daughter. In the end, I conceded that he could smoke on my balcony which I didn’t really want him to do as every time there was a knock on the door or he wanted to tell me something, he would enter my lounge room with his lit cigarette and become angry when I protested. Also he was raving about the past and personal subjects that I told him I didn’t wish to discuss with him, a request that he did not respect…

“I was most uncomfortable with my father in my flat; however I also felt an obligation to honour my pledge to him that he could stay with me. After several days of his visit, I was going mad, so I went to the YMCA in Perth and paid for him to stay in a single room for a week. My father was furious and recommenced all the old abuses and denunciations, towering over me and screaming at me that I should be ashamed of myself. He also told me repeatedly, “Well, you’ve wasted your money because I’m not staying there“. I advised him, “It’s up to you what you do but I’m afraid you can’t stay here any longer“. He did eventually go to the YMCA but he made the rest of his visit in Perth very unpleasant and uncomfortable for me, reviling me and trying to make me feel guilty”…

There’s no need for me to go any further.

W-x is the only one of my father’s four daughters who still has something of a genuine familial relationship with him. She says about him:

“I feel sorry for him because I think he suffers a lot, and always has”.

The overwhelming majority of N-n’s fellow bloggers still seem to possess the view that I’m wanting N-n to discontinue her blogs altogether, which is untrue as well as exasperating! The following is a reproduction of a letter that I received dated 23/7/2012 from ‘FS—-’, Acting Superintendent and Chief of Staff to the Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police:

“Our ref 12/004199

Dear Ms —-,

I write on behalf of the Chief Commissioner to acknowledge your correspondence dated 13 July 2012 seeking the assistance of Victoria Police in preventing the online publication of your personal information by your sister, N-n ——–.

I have reviewed the material contained in your letter and can find no evidence of criminal conduct that would justify the involvement of Victoria Police.

The matters you raise are of a civil nature and their resolution therefore lies within the civil jurisdiction. Victoria Police is unable to assist you in this matter.

Yours faithfully,

FS—-

Acting Superintendent

Chief of Staff to the Chief Commissioner”.

Even though the letter delivered no succour and was very dispiriting, it impressed me insofar as it demonstrated an accurate comprehension of my case ie. that I am not seeking to stymie N-n’s passions as a writer and blogger, but am concerned with “the online publication” of my “personal information“. One person has understood. That’s not to say that he does not, like Red, believe that I am “trash”, or like Prenin and Heretic, that I am “bat shit crazy”, or like Bryan Hemming, that I am “despicable”.  Actually he betrayed nothing at all of his personal view in the letter; but at least one person understood that I am not trying to close down N-n’s blogging sites or prevent her from telling her story. I’m very disappointed that in a post as recent as 4/9/2012, N-n thinks that I would be delighted if she closed down her web site.

By the way, Red, your action in forwarding to N-n my private anguished email to you, which you described as “trash”, is despicable. At some point in the future, (probably not for a few weeks at least), when I can book an extended period of time at a certain venue, (not a public library with limited time), I will really research which is the appropriate agency in your country for receipt of my complaint against you, something along the lines of ethical standards in Internet publishing, and I will register my complaint with said agency as well as forward a copy to Barack Obama. That’s my pledge to you, Red. You are a sociopath just like my sister. What kind of person apportions huge amounts of space on her web site specifically for regularly engaging in lampooning her fellow humankind? For your own sake in attaining some empathy and a little tolerance for human frailty, I hope that one day you will feel as I felt when writing that email. I wish you no harm but I desire that just once in your life, you would feel as I felt.